New York City’s rent-controlled and rent-stabilized housing market sits at a precarious intersection of political ideology, economic headwinds, and long-tail regulatory reform. For decades, these properties—often vilified or valorized depending on your vantage point—have served as both a stabilizing force for working-class tenants and a capital-intensive burden for small landlords. Since the passage of the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (HSTPA), the rules of engagement for owning and financing regulated multifamily buildings have shifted dramatically. But if progressive Assembly Member Zohran Mamdani ascends to the mayor’s office, we may be on the brink of a deeper regulatory entrenchment—one that could further transform property valuations, mortgage underwriting standards, and market cap rates across the city.

​​​

HSTPA: A Rigid Framework in a Dynamic Market

HSTPA significantly curtailed landlords’ ability to raise rents on regulated units, limited capital improvement cost recovery, and placed new restrictions on evictions. While its intent was tenant protection, the policy’s impact on asset value and lending appetite was swift and sharp. According to data from Ariel Property Advisors, multifamily sales volume in NYC fell by over 40% in the year following HSTPA's passage, and cap rates on rent-stabilized portfolios expanded by 75 to 100 basis points as risk premiums soared. Simultaneously, banks began retooling their underwriting criteria—slashing loan-to-value ratios, increasing debt service coverage requirements, and applying deep stress tests on cash flows with little to no upward rent assumptions.

​​​

Post-Pandemic Reverberations: Cap Rates and Valuation Drift

Add the pandemic to the mix, and the calculus grows more complex. Regulatory restrictions layered on top of economic shocks caused by COVID-19 further deteriorated net operating income (NOI) across stabilized portfolios. While Class A market-rate buildings in Manhattan have rebounded in both occupancy and rent levels, rent-regulated properties continue to lag. Recent appraisals suggest that buildings previously valued at a 4% cap rate in 2018 are now trading closer to 5.5–6.0%, if they’re trading at all.

​

According to the New York City Rent Guidelines Board, over 60% of rent-stabilized tenants pay below $1,500 per month, with limited ability to raise rents due to caps on increases. This has translated into underwriting challenges that extend beyond valuation. Lenders like Signature Bank (prior to its collapse) and New York Community Bank had outsized exposure to rent-stabilized portfolios and were already beginning to retreat or reprice risk even before market contagion entered the picture.

​

A Mamdani Administration: Progressive Housing Policy on Overdrive?

Zohran Mamdani, known for his progressive housing platform, has been a vocal critic of landlord-friendly policies and an advocate for a “social housing” model that repositions housing as a public good rather than a financial asset. If elected mayor, Mamdani is likely to double down on tenant protections and expand the scope of rent regulation, potentially introducing new mechanisms to cap rents across formerly exempt buildings or to phase out vacancy decontrol entirely.

From a financial and regulatory standpoint, this could mean further downward pressure on valuations and more stringent underwriting environments. If property cash flows are expected to remain flat—or even decline—due to escalating maintenance costs and tighter rent controls, lenders will likely continue to lower LTVs and increase reserve requirements. Current DSCR benchmarks of 1.35x for stabilized multifamily could become the floor, not the norm, with lenders demanding 1.50x or higher in politically sensitive neighborhoods.

​

The broader market response could be a freeze in transaction volume for these assets, with institutional capital redirecting toward market-rate or out-of-state opportunities. We may also see a rise in note sales or discounted refinancings for owners unable to meet updated underwriting standards under a more restrictive regulatory forecast.

​

What Real Estate Investors Should Consider Now

For current and prospective investors in rent-regulated multifamily, this is not the time for reactive decision-making or binary thinking. Instead, investors should:

• Reassess Exit Strategies: The traditional value-add approach—renovate, raise rents, refinance—is largely defunct in the regulated space. Investors must instead prioritize cash flow stability, long-term asset stewardship, and low-leverage capital structures.

• Model Political Scenarios: Every real estate proforma should now include regulatory sensitivity analysis. What does the investment look like under continued HSTPA constraints? What if additional restrictions are layered in by a Mamdani administration? Treat political developments as real underwriting inputs, not just headlines.

• Strengthen Operating Resilience: Properties that can maintain high occupancy, minimize tenant turnover, and implement cost-efficient maintenance protocols will outperform in this climate. NOI preservation—not expansion—is the new north star.

• Consider Mission-Aligned Partnerships: With an increasing push for nonprofit and public-private ownership models, investors with ESG mandates or social impact goals may find opportunity in partnering with housing-focused foundations or community land trusts.

• Stay Close to Policy Developments: The levers of change aren’t just in City Hall but in Albany. Investors should monitor legislative trends and align with trade organizations advocating for balanced reform that considers both tenant protection and property sustainability.

​

Final Thoughts: Eyes on Policy, Not Just Politics

For institutions financing rent-regulated assets in NYC, this moment requires thoughtful recalibration. A Mamdani administration could bring a reimagining of housing finance and ownership in ways not seen since the post-war rent control era. While his election would likely energize tenant advocates and nonprofits, it would also introduce new uncertainties for lenders and investors attempting to model risk in an already opaque sector.

​

This is not an alarmist view, but a pragmatic one. NYC’s rent-regulated mortgage market was already fragile post-HSTPA. If Mamdani wins and delivers on his housing agenda, we’ll be looking at a new playbook entirely—one where real estate finance professionals must reassess not just underwriting models, but the very assumptions about ownership, income, and long-term asset value.